*Stuff* Study Abroad Students Say

It’s Study Abroad Fair Season! Students are being ushered to their respective unions in droves. They shuffle among institutional agreements, third-party providers, stories of transformative experiences, and glossy handouts and marketing swag. What are students hoping to find? What are educators hoping to encourage? How will we know that the learning was meaningful? The guest post below offers some reflective thinking on a provocative video created by two Amizade interns last year.

One editorial note before we begin: responsible, deeply engaging, and educationally meaningful programs occur everywhere. The biting wit that is central to the video should push us again to ask what we are seeking and encouraging in international education - and how we will know when it occurs.

By Missy Gluckmann

A few weeks ago, I googled “shit study abroad students say” after seeing the brilliant “Shit New Yorkers Say” video sensation. I was hoping someone would do a version of this for study abroad – and today, in my inbox, it magically appeared!

(Side note: The students who made this video did call it “Stuff Study Abroad Students Say.” I am honoring the “Shit People Say” series by renaming this video with the appropriate “bad” word.)

Now watch this clever video! Laugh. Roll your eyes. Be sad. Smile. Do whatever feels right for you. Then read the rest of this post:

Did you enjoy that? Was it hard to watch? Did any of this sound familiar?

It sure did to me. Four colleges under my belt and I cannot begin to tell you how many times I’ve heard these statements. They come from the young voices of (US) Americans from an incredibly ethnocentric country (see this previous Melibee post), one that is slapping together study abroad programs faster than many would like to admit. Many are revenue driven and poorly designed, leading to students belting out statements like the ones in the video. (Please don’t get me wrong – there are plenty of schools and 3rd party providers that put great care into study abroad program design and learning outcomes. But many – let’s face it – don’t. )

The timing of this video really struck me. Yesterday I had the honor of facilitating an online workshop with Dr. Eric Hartman on Global Service Learning– and it couldn’t have been more timely. Dr. Hartman spoke of the importance of partnership, culture, careful learning outcomes, mutual respect, addressing our ethnocentricity prior to departure., etc. The gap between great global service learning program delivery and the “run of the mill” study abroad experience is clear. These students, in my opinion, did a remarkable job of capturing that delta in this video.

This video will serve as a beautiful new resource for pre-departure, orientation, re-entry programs, classroom discussions and academic programs (international education administration/intercultural studies.) It has so many applications!

What are your thoughts about this video? How might you envision it being utilized? What did you appreciate about it? What frustrated you about it? Let’s get some dialogue going about this subject.

Let me close by extending my heartfelt thanks to the Amizade students for creating not only this video, but the opportunity for all of us to reflect on how we contribute to the statements you have highlighted. Once again, students are providing teaching opportunities. Does it get any better than that?

- See more at: http://melibeeglobal.com/2012/02/sht-study-abroad-students-say/#sthash.B1fDUflf.dpuf

********************************************************************************

Missy Gluckmann brings more than twenty years of international education experience to her leadership at Melibee Global and support of A Better Abroad. We re-post these reflections here with her permission. We thank her for the opportunity and for her energetic field provocation and leadership.

Posted in Global Citizenship, International Service-Learning, Service-Learning | Leave a comment

Enabling Speech: A Communications Partnership in Peru

“I cried when Dr. Manoj Abraham—a surgeon from Vassar Hospital—put the last stitch into the baby’s lip.”

Today’s guest post is from Dr. Shari Berkowitz, an assistant professor at Mercy College in Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. We thank Dr. Berkowitz both for the opportunity to re-post her blog entry and for answering many questions to ensure consistency with high quality global health volunteer trips that avoid the unfortunately common missteps plaguing too many programs.

Specifically, Dr. Berkowitz shared that the program professionals and administrators, all of whom have medical training or background, cooperated closely with local healthcare professionals to ensure post-operative continuation of care. They also scheduled more complicated surgeries earlier in the program, opting to leave interventions less likely to need follow-up attention for later. The visiting group is primarily comprised of Spanish speakers, and they also partner with local medical students to support translation. They have returned to cooperate with the same community members and healthcare institutions multiple times. Their story begins below.

In March, I traveled to Lima, Peru, with our Mercy College communications disorders program director, Helen Buhler, and a team of 27 physicians, surgeons, nurses, technicians and other SLPs. We were there as part Mercy College’s partnership with Healing the Children, Northeast, which provides primarily surgical services to children in need in the United States and abroad.

Over the week we were there, 37 children had surgery; some had traveled for 7 days to reach the hospital. We SLPs worked on parent training, peer training and direct service delivery. Here are some excerpts from the blog I kept during our visit.

~~~~

I cried when Dr. Manoj Abraham—a surgeon from Vassar Hospital—put the last stitch into the baby’s lip.

On Friday, Helen, Marianella Bonelli—an SLP and Mercy alum—and I visited with all the parents on the ward. For those whose children had had a lip repair, we celebrated together, admiring their beautiful babies. For those who had their lips repaired but still would need palate surgery in the future, we also gave advice on helping the kids develop good speech habits now to establish good airflow from the mouth after the palate is closed. We worked directly with the kids who had newly closed palates and their parents, teaching about how to bring the sounds out through the mouth and not the nose. Needless to say, there were many therapy materials, toys and goodies passed around, ensuring we went home empty handed but the kids did not.

After speech rounds, we put on fresh scrubs and went to surgery. Dr. Abraham was operating on a baby with a cleft lip that went up into her nose all the way, and welcomed us to observe him.

He was putting this baby’s nose together, carefully making it match the other side as much as possible. He worked some more on the deep layers of the lip, making sure it would be able to have free movement. Then he sutured the philtrum, the raised line that runs down from your nostril to the beginning of the red part of your lip. Suddenly, this baby had a sweet Cupid’s bow of a mouth…a mouth that would pout and pucker, shout, whisper…

Even though it was my second time in the OR and I thought I was over it, I cried and cried. Writing this now, I’m crying again.

What a gift.

~~~~

As I came into the speech office (a commandeered storage room), I saw Helen doing…arts and crafts?

Helen always says we do cowgirl therapy on these trips—shooting from the hip. When an 11-year-old girl with cerebral palsy arrived with very few spoken words, and those few only intelligible to her mom, Helen created an old school low-tech augmentative communication device. She used paper, a sheet protector and some of our speech materials to create a board with some basic vocabulary.

The mom was thrilled to have a way for her daughter to communicate some wants and needs to others in her life. Helen showed her how to create more pages for the board as the child mastered its use. The mom’s eyes were shining—it was so obvious that the board would be implemented immediately.

Based on a quick evaluation, it was clear that the child understood a lot more than she could say, so we hope this is a way she can start to “say” something to the world at last.

~~~~

We also worked with a four year old boy with hearing loss due to a malformation of the external and middle ear. He has had recurrent ear infections and had drainage from one ear. He was taking an assortment of antibiotics, and his mom had a thick folder of medical records with her. Although his audiological testing shows a hearing loss, he is not currently a candidate for surgery (Dr. Ryan Brown graciously gave him an exam on the fly to double check).

Helen spent some time with the mom, teaching about behavior management, and I taught her about sign language. I taught them three signs: “go,” “more” and “eat.” The kid chased me around the grounds of the hospital, as we worked our way over to our surgical consult, and I would only run if he signed, “go.” We went from hand-over-hand to slight physical prompt, to following a model for the sign “go.”

The mother was shocked at how positive our interaction was—he was laughing as he chased me. Soon, this kid will experience the power of controlling his world through communication.

Score one for the speech department.

Dr. Berkowitz, PhD, CCC-SLP, is an affiliate of the American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) Special Interest Groups 10 (Issues in Higher Education) and 17 (Global Issues in Communications Sciences and Related Disorders). Her research interests include cross-language and bilingual speech perception, multi-modal speech perception and integrating technology and instrumentation into the communication disorders curriculum. This post originally appeared on the ASHA blog.

As always, thanks for reading, thanks for the emails, tweets, and likes, and please like our new Facebook Page to keep up with posts, share them easily, and continue engaging in dialogue about careful and conscientious community engagement around the world.

Posted in Reflections from the Field | Leave a comment

What is Enough? Educating for Transformation, Seeking More

Julia Lang, one of our regular contributors, just completed three weeks of teaching at the Civic Leadership Institute. After interacting with a homeless person on the way home one night, Julia found herself wondering what more she could do. She offers a great set of reflections and challenges for everyone working at the intersections of university and community, education and transformation.

By Julia Lang

Three days before students left the Civic Leadership Institute*, where I had just spent three weeks teaching about inequality, power, privilege, leadership, social justice, social responsibility, and leading service projects throughout San Francisco, I found myself walking home alone back to the dorms at midnight. The program was going well, students were having breakthroughs and grappling with really tough social issues and personal biases, and I felt proud for the transformation I was seeing in my classroom.

We had recently heard a homeless man read poetry about the great love of his life and speak of his loss and dehumanization from living years on the street. As I was walking my mind wandered to the moment when one of my students tearfully admitted “I have never looked them in the eye…I was taught to look away…I now see them as people…I will now see everyone as just people.” This was good. We were making progress. I was getting through to them. The world was cracking open.

Ahead of me, an older man was standing alone on the street selling “Street Sheet”, a newspaper created and sold by the homeless. I was familiar with the paper—in fact, a week prior, I had led my 15 students into the Tenderloin District to do a service project with the Coalition for the Homeless, who put out the paper. As I approached the man, he asked me to buy the paper, explaining how it would help him buy a warm room for the night. I apologetically replied that I had already bought two of the same exact issues. It was true, I had. I lingered a moment, wished him a good night and then moved on.

One block away, then three. With every step, a deep feeling of disgust and self-loathing grew in my gut. I had just spent three weeks tirelessly trying to inspire students to care for their fellow humans, and here I was walking back to my warm bed to rise early and teach the same theme the next morning. Would my life be different if I gave him one dollar? Five? Twenty?

If I did nothing or, even a small thing to help him, what did that mean for others, who knew nothing about the paper, had never been to the headquarters, had never spoken directly to a homeless stranger?

Now several blocks away, I spun on my heels and walked back to the corner where I had left him. As he saw me approaching, he eagerly took two steps forward, excited to pitch his paper to a stranger who might make him one dollar closer to a warm rest for the evening. He soon recognized me, hung his head and stepped back, knowing I had already refused. I continued approaching and after walking directly up to him, an outstretched $20 in my hand, he raised his head, saw the bill, opened his arms and pulled me inside his wide weary arms, the thick calluses of his hands folding around my shoulders. Near tears, he asked me to say a prayer with him; I whispered back that I was not religious, but did believe that we are all connected and responsible for helping each other. I squeezed back, wished him a warm bed for the night and to take good care of himself, and then I walked home. Within a block, I was gasping for breath through deep, guttural sobs.

I knew that my quick act of charity meant nothing in the long term. I was teaching my students to treat the root causes, not the symptoms of problems, but what more could I do? Especially right then? I could feel like I did something that one night for that man, but what about the night after that? And the next? What about the other thousands of people wrapped in blankets on the pavement that night? If I did one thing for one, could I justify not doing anything to use my privilege to ease the suffering of others?

As I continued walking home, shuffling in my shame, I began to ask myself the deeply personal, disturbing question that continues to plague and haunt me as I prepare to lead another extensive service-learning trip: What is enough?

What do we want our students to actually learn, gain and DO from these experiences and how are we as educators holding ourselves accountable? Do we practice what we preach? If so, how?

If you think you do, do you? Really?

If we truly commit to educating students about social justice, privilege, inequality and oppression, and working to create a more just world, are we condemning ourselves as practitioners to never live a comfortable middle-class life?

As I continue to work for service-learning organizations in the US and abroad, I am increasingly gaining more of an understanding of “good practice” in the field—be it how to facilitate effective reflection sessions, create reciprocal educational opportunities between students and community members, or intentionally construct opportunities for intercultural contact and exchange. Great. I can do that.

But as I dive further into this field, I am left with a gaping hole in my own mind about my own social responsibility— until I really understand what I am expecting of myself, I feel somewhat paralyzed in inspiring students to become “agents of change” and “active, global citizens.”

As an educator teaching others to recognize and work to fight injustice, I don’t yet know how I fit into this glaringly unjust world. I haven’t yet decided what my own personal sacrifice…commitment…responsibilities are. I teach others to gain an awareness of their privilege and use it to become a more active citizen devoted to social change but what is it that I actually want from my students and what is it I will demand from myself?

If a privileged young woman returns home from an intensive service-learning experience and now sees everyone as people, smiles at the homeless person, looks them straight in the eye, gives them a dollar and wishes them well— is that enough?

I don’t think so. That wont really change much at all.

If a young man returns home and begins volunteering at his local soup kitchen once a week, have we succeeded?

If we, the educators, devote hours of our time and receive little pay for facilitating service-learning experiences, only to go home, do a lot of yoga, take a vacation to the beach to decompress, and go out to dinner with our partner, are we too, falling back into our comfort, our privilege?

What is the alternative?

Do I give a percentage of my income to those in need? We teach our students to do more than charity, so if we listen to our own words, that is not enough. Giving $20 to a homeless man is certainly not enough.

But as educators, we are helping dozens, hundreds, maybe even thousands of students view the world differently! That should surely be enough, right?! Yet that so easily allows us off the hook— we are helping others to recognize inequality and injustice and develop a sense of empowerment and responsibility to be active citizens, so through our work getting OTHERS to carry the torch, we can just continue to light it and still sleep well at night.

Am I then a coward? Are we hypocrites?

As I get ready to embark in September for Central America, where I will lead a group of college students on a for-credit service-learning semester in Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala and Costa Rica (who are each paying over $8,000 for the experience), I find myself agonizing over what my intended impact will be, both for my students and for myself. It almost seems too easy to use educating others as my contribution to the world because I am just passing off the responsibility to actually do anything for others.

What is “enough” for a student returning from this trip? Do we hold ourselves to the same standards that we idealistically set for our students?

In an unjust world where we hold the power and privilege, what is it that we are actually asking of our students and ourselves? How do we hold ourselves accountable to fight for the transformation that we wish to see and become models to our students as agents of positive change?

I don’t have the answer but I suppose asking the right questions is the first step.

 

* Note: The Civic Leadership Institute (CLI) at the University of California, Berkeley, is a three-week long civic leadership and activism camp through the Center for Talented Youth (CTY). CTY sponsors several summer camps to provide talented students with an opportunity to be among other intelligent peers and work beyond the traditional classroom. Its unique twist: let’s take the best and the brightest in the world (students hail from China, Puerto Rico, Germany, etc.) and for eight hours a day, teach them about hunger, poverty, environmental destruction, and power and privilege.

Every other day, students trade classroom learning for experience in the community, completing projects throughout San Francisco, be it helping to serve meals to the homeless at Glide in the Tenderloin district, beautifying a women’s shelter in Oakland, packing hundreds of oranges at the San Francisco Food Bank, or advocating to abolish the death penalty with the ACLU. The program works incredibly hard to create a living/learning community where the academic and residential sides of the programs create a powerful, immersive experience for youth to grapple with really difficult realities in the world and in their own minds in a safe and supportive environment. Learn more here: http://www.ctd.northwestern.edu/cep/programs/cli/

 

 

Posted in Global Service-Learning, Power and Privilege, Reflections from the Field, Service-Learning, Values | 1 Comment

Upcoming: GSL Best of the Best, Updates from the Field, Fair Trade Learning, Community Impact, & New Intern!

Welcome back to the academic year in North America! We have an exciting slate lined up for the next few months as we continue to assemble, organize, and share leading resources and reflective pieces on careful and conscientious community-engagement around the world.

Soon we will be sharing updates from the field from our regular contributor Julia Lang as well as Dr. Shari Berkowitz, Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Disorders at Mercy College in New York.

We have also begun to organize a GSL Best of the Best list compiled last year by Melody Porter, Associate Director of Community Engagement at the College of William and Mary. Porter and colleagues asked members of the Break Away and Higher Education - Service-Learning (HE-SL) listserves to share their favorite resources relating to community engagement and alternative breaks. While this website was mentioned as a resource, there were many additional contributions. We’re going to steadily share those additional contributions here.

Following months of conference proceedings, written feedback, conference calls, and efforts to integrate a very broad constituency of voices, next week we will release draft guidelines on Fair Trade Learning for comment and feedback.

Related, we anticipate two posts upcoming from researchers who are focused on community impact assessment in global service-learning. They’re both part of a pre-conference panel centered on community outcomes at the International Association for Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement.

Finally, we are very excited to announce the addition of a new intern at the Building a Better World Forum, Elizabeth Rosenberg. Elizabeth is a masters student in Social Work and Public Health at the University of Maryland Baltimore, where she concentrates in community and population health, community action, and social policy. Her global service-learning experience began while studying abroad in Hacienda Vieja, El Salvador. She continued this work in the University of Maryland Leadership & Community Service Learning office, where she trained and advised trip leaders of international alternative break trips. She has served internationally with several service-learning teams as well as collaborating with Break Away: The Alternative Break Connection. She aims to share her experience with service learning and to learn from other active citizens and global stewards.

As always, thanks for reading, thanks for the emails, tweets, and likes, and please like our new Facebook Page to keep up with posts, share them easily, and continue engaging in dialogue about careful and conscientious community engagement around the world.

- Eric Hartman

Posted in Global Service-Learning | Leave a comment

The Ethics of International Development: A Video on Voluntourism

Through the Ethics in International Engagement & Service-Learning Project at the University of British Columbia, students composed this compelling video that considers:

  • What do you think you’re doing?
  • What are you really doing?

(When you serve abroad). It raises important questions and will certainly be useful in challenging other students and would-be volunteers as they consider international engagement opportunities. The EIESL Project website above also includes links to numerous additional, related resources.

Posted in Global Service-Learning | 4 Comments

Graduate Intern Wanted at the Building a Better World Forum for Global Service-Learning

The Building a Better World Forum for Global Service-Learning is seeking a graduate or advanced undergraduate intern to support the development of online dialogue and open access resources that advance conscientious cross-cultural service and learning around the world. To date, the BBW Forum has organized more than 250 peer-reviewed research resources on global service-learning as well as teaching tools and syllabi examples. Additionally, the blog regularly features the perspective of critical, conscientious researchers, practitioners, and activists who are working to advance a world that more completely recognizes human dignity and environmental sustainability.

Desired Qualifications and Expectations:

  • Ability to commit 10 - 15 hours a week beginning September 1, 2013, and ideally continuing through May 1, 2014.
  • Extraordinary attention to detail and ability to work independently essential
  • Familiarity with WordPress and wiki applications highly desired; willingness to learn essential
  • Familiarity with at least one of the following fields, preferably more: service-learning, international education, development studies, critical theory, global service-learning
  • Ability to enhance social media capabilities, SEO, and general audience desired
  • This is a volunteer position; it extends a website that has to date been developed with entirely voluntary resources and commitments

Benefits:

  • Integration with the most current dialogue on global service-learning
  • Opportunity to grow in knowledge base, skills, dialogue with existing researchers and practitioners, and social media capabilities
  • Opportunity to contribute blogs as part of the internship experience
  • Publication experience and connection with diverse researchers in the field

To Apply:

Send resume and cover letter specifying relationship between experience and desired qualifications to[email protected] by August 15, 2013. Applicants will be contacted in late August.

Posted in Global Service-Learning | Leave a comment

Cultivating the “Nat Geo” Spirit: Students as Explorers, Scientists, and Artists

I’m excited to introduce the first of several upcoming posts by Julia Lang. Julia has previously contributed to this conversation by sharing entries relating to her thesis research: Culture. Shock. Service. Study Abroad. Global Citizenship? and Transformative Experience: Service-Learning Student to Scholar. She has a very exciting upcoming year of global service-learning leadership, and she will be sharing reflections here about her work with National Geographic Student Experiences in Costa Rica, The Civic Leadership Institute, and Carpe Diem Global Education. Julia begins with this update and set of reflections for practitioners from Costa Rica:

By Julia Lang

This summer, I had the remarkable opportunity to lead U.S. high school students on a two-week community service trip in Costa Rica for National Geographic Student Expeditions. Hired to scope out the community service site before the group arrived, I found myself drifting into conversation with locals on public buses, and later perched on a wooden stool at a dirt floored little food “soda” shop three hours off of the Pan American highway, planning a menu with local Ticos who had never set foot outside their tiny town, let alone Costa Rica. Yet, every person I encountered had heard of National Geographic and was excited to meet me, an ambassador of the magazine.

National Geographic perhaps has the most influence over young children, their tiny hands leafing through the pages, eyes glossing over words but bulging at images of creatures from every corner of the world, deepest depths of the sea and far reaches of outer space. As a child, I would make collages from these photos; as I matured, National Geographic’s images inspired me to learn more about a world of which I was completely unaware, living a somewhat isolated and insulated life in upstate New York. Clearly, I was not alone, as National Geographic reaches some 450 million people a month, and has done so for decades.

I have participated in and led multiple service-learning and international programs in high school, college, and graduate school, where I was the graduate assistant in the Center for Civic Engagement. In this role, I created, planned and executed our alternative break program, in which students went on educational service trips during school breaks. While I have been steeped in service-learning for years now, I was eager to see how service and travel was framed under National Geographic and how this job would expand the view that I had of service and enhance my ability to facilitate transformative learning experiences for students.

The four-day National Geographic training in rural Vermont united 60 leaders and experts who would guide photography, biodiversity and wildlife conservation, community service, and creative writing trips to countries ranging from Tanzania, Greece, and Iceland to New Zealand, Brazil, and China. Together, we learned about a new approach, the “Nat Geo spirit,” as it is lovingly called by veteran staff and cultivated by leaders in young travelers.

Throughout training, we learned how to apply the “Nat Geo spirit” in our trips to make it different from trips we might have led in the past. This spirit, captured in National Geographic, makes it different from other travel magazines. Its glossy pages do not tell you where to find the most pristine infinity pool while enjoying a Thai massage. Rather, the magazine captures wild animals in their natural habitat, reveals untold stories of people or exotic creatures as yet unexplored, and presents meticulous research that promotes conservation and education.

We learned how to translate this perspective into a student travel and community service program. Our first day of training in Costa Rica, my co-lead and I laid out a big blank white poster board on the floor and asked students to brainstorm what this “Nat Geo spirit” might entail. With faces looming over the board, students chirped out ideas as we scribbled them down: witness, conservation, adventurer, documentation, photography, science, natural habitat, preservation, pioneer, diversity, education.

We eventually honed it down to one key phrase: As a participant on a National Geographic trip, you are a traveler and an explorer, not a tourist. Your aim is to witness, honor, and document differences, not try to change anything to fit your worldview and cultural assumptions or to try to keep things within the boundaries of your comfort level.

Thus, the service component of our trip took on a whole new meaning. Our goal was not to swoop in and “save those poor people,” but to come as humble students of the world seeking to learn and appreciate what we found in local contexts, such as food, how people treat time, roads, homes, religious views, political views, natural habitats, etc.

In the Nat Geo spirit – to dive deeper into what is authentic and to personally document –our students were challenged during orientation to create an artifact of their journey and learning. At our community service village, students slept on a tile floor in an open-air community center beneath tin tables draped with mosquito nets, while beetles and moths gathered in droves and the sunrise woke us up at dawn. Reminding the students to travel through the lens of the Nat Geo spirit, we asked them to document their discomfort, their insight, and their learning. Onto the poster board, they brainstormed what this might look like: photographs, poems, videos, painting a striking scene, learning how to cook a meal, investigating and reporting on a particular aspect of the community, exploring the local flora and fauna, learning a new skill with someone in the community and documenting it in some way, perhaps interviewing a community member and writing an expose.

I had never taken this angle with a service project before. Sure, I had kept a group journal, facilitated nightly reflection and switched it up here and there with a creative reflection, handing out paper and markers and asking students to draw a picture representing a powerful insight from their day. Yet, never before had I jointly focused on the group’s learning as a whole, and on unique individual projects.

We helped students hone in on a particular social issue, community asset or aspect, and how to document their topic – through photography, writing, critical thinking and/or technology skills. Their goal was to create an artifact to share with friends and family and to remind themselves of what they did, what they learned, and even who they were during this particular point in their life.

By challenging students to spearhead an individual project and supporting/mentoring them through the process, students benefitted from their intentional and individual intercultural contact, repeated opportunities for personalized reflection, enhanced communication and language skills, and critical thinking abilities. Examples of the final projects included a video asking locals what they wished for, a new sign a small group of students painted for a local “convenience” store and a subsequent video that documented their progress, and an essay on how Costa Rica changed a student’s view of the United States.

Short-term service-learning experiences are often powerful, eye-opening experiences for students, but it is all too easy for students to retreat back into their previous and comfortable mindsets. By explicitly treating students as explorers, scientists, and artists capable of producing powerful, tangible artifacts of their journey, students not only get more out from their experience, but also have a tangible reminder of their transformative experience for the future. Such individual projects can also serve as powerful pre-education and fundraising tools as they give life and voice to the deep impact experiential experiences have on students, communities, and educators. At the end of the trip, a gallery or showing of the projects is a remarkable reflection tool and powerful way for the group to come together as whole to celebrate and honor everything that they saw, did, and created.

Cultivating the “Nat Geo spirit” and challenging students to create tangible individual projects are extraordinary tools for teaching them how to travel in a more culturally sensitive, environmentally conscious, and sustainable fashion, while also enriching the entire experience for individual students and the group as a whole.

I encourage other practitioners to develop a culture of travel, even if their experiential trip is just a few miles down the road, and to challenge students to imagine, create and share a tangible artifact of their exploration and learning.

For an example of an individual project from Julia’s National Geographic Community Service trip watch Mi Deseo es / My Wish is:

 

Posted in Reflections from the Field | Leave a comment